For example I won't travel with my heavy 70-200 f2.8+ftz or I won't take portrait with an Z 24-200 f4-6.3. If you know what I mean. (My english is a little bit limited) For your poll, I still voted 70-300 f4.5-5.6. It seems a better compromise in terms of Price/IQ/Weight against the 70-200 f4 even if it seems ideal to have an f4 trinity with Z
Above from left to right: Nikon AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G ED VR on FTZ adapter, Z 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 VR S, Nikon Z 70-200mm f2.8 VR S on Z TC-1.4x AF-operation of the lens in photo-mode can be heard as a low buzz from the outside but if you record video with the built-in microphone AF is silent – as is VR operation.
The tripod mount ring support base is tailor-made and compatible with Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Lens, can't be used for other lenses?the measured volume of the replacement foot is about 93 x 65 x 31mm (without screws), net weight is about 100g; 2. The lens collar foot adopts original structure design, the appearance is improved, and
The Nikon Z 70-180mm f/2.8 is a smaller and less expensive alternative to the premium Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S, and as such, should be one of the best Nikon Z-mount lenses for subjects such as portraits and events. Meanwhile, the latter is a long-range yet still reasonably portable zoom for sports, aviation, and wildlife photography.
It’s not as unusually well-priced as the 800mm f/6.3, but it’s still a good value compared to Nikon’s usual trend. Hats off to Nikon for that. Still, prospective buyers should note that the $3250 MSRP is higher than that of the Z 70-200mm f/2.8 S and Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 S, which retail for $2600 and $2700 respectively.
Nikon Z7 II Nikon Z8 Nikon Z 24-70mm F2.8 Nikon Z 70-200 F2.8 VR Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
Is anyone using the Tamron 70-210 f4 on a Nikon Z ? I have a Z6ii and have the Sigma Sport 70-200 f2.8. It’s an excellent lens and doesn’t get used regularly. Even though it’s tack sharp, it’s just heavy 4#. I’m looking for an alternative. I also have the 24-120 f4 F mount, which I could use and have to crop.
I recently chose the 24-200 and 35 f1. 8 as my vacation kit. The 24-200 was great during the day for touring and landscape, then the 35 was my go to for late day /after sunset when we were in town or at dinner. Light weight, compact. It worked out perfectly. I own the 24-70 f2. 8 and 70-200 f2. 8 for work, but they are waaaaay heavy for casual
70–200 mm: Image stabilization Nikon Nikkor Z 70-180mm F2.8. Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 Di III VC VXD G2. Latest reviews. Fujifilm X-S20. 86 %
Nikon Z7 II Nikon Z 50mm F1.8 Nikon Z 24-70mm F2.8 Nikon Z 70-200 F2.8 VR Nikon Z 14-24mm F2.8 +2 more selected answer This post was selected as the answer by the original poster. Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
Dec 6, 2021. #3. Nikon recommends you attach the lens via the tripod collar rather than the camera body tripod mount. There are a couple of reasons, vibration due to the extended weight out front of the mounting point and less stress on the lens mount. Additionally, carry the lens by the lens foot rather than by the camera body.
. 1emcp8owts.pages.dev/21emcp8owts.pages.dev/2181emcp8owts.pages.dev/11emcp8owts.pages.dev/1131emcp8owts.pages.dev/4281emcp8owts.pages.dev/831emcp8owts.pages.dev/4541emcp8owts.pages.dev/241
nikon z 70 200 f2 8 weight
